the truth is there are professional patients, that seek health care for the slightest ailment, tying up emergency rooms with a scrape on their finger, seeking opioids for 'pain'. also there are those that would rather be in hospital than recovering at home tying up beds for those that really need it.
maybe if the protestors and unhoused spent as much effort cleaning up the camps of litter and garbage, the optics would be better. plastering stickers around the city saying Fluck the bylaw doesn't help their cause either.
Depends, if it was already a signed deal, wouldn't there be a big penalty for cancelling it? Then the taxpayers would be on the hook for that and a higher cost from the next bidder.
The Charter has been interpreted too liberally, what about the life, liberty and security of the rest of the public, don't we have rights as well? There are alternatives, but it is farther out into the country, lot's of crown land way up North as well ( and there are rules about living on Crown land , maximum time in one spot, waste disposal etc ) but expecting to have a prime downtown camping spot is unrealistic, why do you think people have to pay a premium for downtown rent or condos?
24 stories is way out of line with the zoning in the area, even 12 is pushing the limit and as always, parking is already an issue with so many working downtown but parking on the side streets here.
I've taught my son always to have his head on a swivel in Parking lots and pay attention to the reverse lights on cars because of blind spots. Too many pedestrians assume drivers can see them and just walk right behind cars w/o looking. I'm surprised the driver was even charged because technically, the HTA does not apply to private property such as parking lots.
Guelph has a very small downtown, removing cars from that intersection is cutting the heart out of traffic flow, for transit, deliveries and especially for emergency services which pass by there many times a day.
There is a reason people can't just build homes in the woods where ever they like, no emergency access, no utility hookups like sewage, most likely on private property. If this was allowed, what's to stop the outskirts of Guelph becoming a shanty town? Can't live in shelters or just doesn't want to put up with people? Sometimes you need to compromise for a while. 1400 is much more than someone on O/W gets, a single unit is possible with that income.
Maybe they shouldn't have set an unrealistic goal to begin with. Most countries are nowhere near meeting their goals, it was all just virtual signaling by making these proclamations that would have to be dealt with by future generations down the road. It's fine and dandy to say zero emissions 50 years from now, and not actually do much in the first 5 years until another group of politicians are elected and have to deal with it.