Just wait until these unemployed workers property tax bill goes 3% to pay for the repairs to the pool that are estimated at 22 million but we all know will cost 44 million. Families reduce expenditures when they see bad times coming. News flash city of PG - that light at the end of the tunnel is a train. Start reigning in spending, all these "small tax increases" are beginning to add up.
Okay, I'm not against it, because, there really is a connection between past wrongs and current suffering - anything to help indigenous people succeed is in all our best interests.But what I am against, is this policy of letting low skilled people who do not share Canadian values come basically en masse so that we can get amazon parcels delivered and coffee served. First Nations prospering will raise all boats, immigration for the sake of vote buying, will sink them as people who have no historical connection to the land continue to overwhelm the healthcare and housing resources.
Seems ironic that this article of not in my backyard is just below the article of hundreds of job losses at Canfor. I expect this kind of out of touchness from the Lower Mainland but people here should be able to make the connection between resource revenue and paying for our homes, vehicles and food, not to mention 22 million for the pool.
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" is widely attributed to Edmund Burke.The problem we have now, is if good men (women, persons,) do anything, they are usually the ones ending up with fines and in jail. I guarantee if you decided to take it upon yourself to go out at night, and spray down fires, and those who start them, you will be charged with assault. And you, being a person with a job, likely will get a fine.We are in a downward spiral where good persons don't dare do anything.
Did I miss the announcement that Canfor is reopening all mills and building two new pulp mills. They're spending like the tax base is solid. It's not. We should be trying to figure out how to make do with less. Not use the never ending credit line that the Municipal Financing Authority gave us to build more nice to haves. And BTW - where are the doctors and nurses coming from for this population increase we're pushing?
What they should be protesting is people having children. More people, more harm to the environment. Hard for them to understand, but we make lumber, we trade lumber for things we need like food. You want to keep those trees standing until they fall down, then find a way to feed everyone without resource extraction.
I think this is a good thing, but not as good as it sounds. You still have the issue of catch and release. What will be good, is if AI, or a human, notices someone starting a fire, and it gets dealt with quickly. But for every day crime, stores already have alarm systems, but it doesn't prevent a motivated thief. And even if the thief is caught, there is "reasons" that they should be released.
These licenses don't give you free logs. They are the right to cut - but you still have to pay stumpage and you still have to plant trees. It's not like buying private land. UNLESS, the First Nation can get it incorporated into their reserve lands. That would be a real game changer - good for them, not so good for the deficit spending NDP government.
Conservatives just don't get it. The central right worries about extremism. She cares about faith - which faith? If a Muslim or Sikh won and said that, I'd be concerned - so why wouldn't they be concerned. Conservatives, can't you just elect a fiscally responsible leader who cares about public safety. Do we really have to hitch our wagon to the further right. Then again, if Eby stays, we can kiss any kind of prosperity goodbye. As a good socialist he believes those who create wealth, must have cheated, and need to be taxed accordingly.
I question the purposes of more RCMP. I think there should be less. Most criminals are released before the paperwork is done. Might as well save the money and maybe give it to the victims of the crime.
For clarity, Canfor's rights are a right to cut in exchange for stumpage. So, sure, take them away, but whoever you give them to, how are they going to afford the stumpage when Canfor couldn't - or, is the plan to let the transferees not pay any stumpage at all. If that is an option, why wasn't it given to Canfor?
I hate to be a Debbie Downer, but not all indigenous groups are on board. So, step one, go to court. Court sets out what's needed to go forward. Company complies. F.N. still unhappy. Environmentalists and unhappy indigenous groups protest. Blockade. Make it impossible to build. See, courts are only useful to these groups when they agree with them. When courts don't agree with them, they default to ignoring injunctions. Not sure if there's an solution. Then again, the Liberals have shown they will use a heavy boot when it suits them.
The rate of cut was doubled to salvage as much value out of dying trees as they could. We knew today was coming - why are we surprised. FYI - no business runs at a cash loss indefinitely. If you want to take over the mills, the tenure, fund it with your own money, and then lose cash every day you run, offer Canfor a $1.00 for the mills, they'll probably take it and escape the cost of tearing the mills down.
We're told there is unprecedented food bank use. We're told their is a shortage of housing and rental accommodation. We're told the forest industry is in decline. Our city has rarely built anything that came within budget. So, with so many storm clouds on the horizon, you'd think we'd be preparing for rain, not sunshine. BTW- property taxes are regressive taxation when it comes to those on fixed incomes and those renting via landlords passing on the cost.
These is great news. Curious though. You say it's for seniors. Does that mean the brain damaged fentanyl addicts won't be housed there, and if not, where? Because they are currently taking up long term care beds.