So there are 557 homeless people, with the number expected to grow, but the 5 million dollar a year village we are building will only have 80-100 units? Obviously encampments aren’t going anywhere.
The new city manager is shoving this down our throats. I am very surprised by some of the positive reception he has been receiving since taking over. All he’s done is spend money and insist we grow our population, meanwhile, a lack of housing is the reason we have so many people living in tents! We can’t take on more people until we get more affordable housing!
Read up on how Edmonton just handled their encampments. The human rights approach was forced upon them but was thrown out in court, and the city then went to town tearing down encampments. Over 50 of them. And guess what? The people living in them ended up in actual housing or shelters because their hand was forced. Tough love, but it worked. Stop enabling these people.
You’re not naive enough to think these drugs are not being produced within the US itself? The amount of illegal guns flowing into our country from the US is a bigger issue.
WiseOwl: you actually think Pollivere is any better? He’ll cut the carbon tax then stick it to you some other way. That’s why they all do. Sides don’t matter.
It’s not ridiculous actually. Teachers hands are completely tied nowadays by administrations that bow and cater to every demand made by parents. Somebody had to step in.
People need to read up on the Waterloo decision. It doesn’t say we can’t evict encampers. It says we can’t evict them IF there is no shelter space, and I know for a fact that there is in this city. More than enough. Time to put our foot down.