Those who want it designated should have to pay for it themselves. The taxpayer and the current owner should not be saddled with any costs. Any future owner assumes the costs upon purchase
Any costs associated to this should be 100% carried by those who subscribe to heritage designations. The taxpayer should in no way have to pay for someone else's pet project
Don't complain about your deficit then. Cut off financially viable companies and pay the price willingly and without complaint. Go get funding from the eco warriors. Good luck with that.
Time to deal with this issue and call these vehicles what they really are. ATVs.While we are at it let's get electric wheelchairs and mobility scooters off of the roads and bike lanes. Get on the sidewalk where you can legally be. You fought for years to be pedestrians. It is time to get off the road.
Always nice how the complainant gets to remain anonymous. I would take a gamble and keep the chickens, take the charge and demand the complainant come to open court to testify. No court is going to levy the maximum fine.
Only way to eventually stop this childish behaviour is to expel students from their university, no refund and ban them from reapplying to any Ontario University for 5 years. Millions of tax dollars have been spent over the years babysitting these so called adults.
You know who could have prevented a large share of this? The Trudeau Government. Half a million new folks every year looking for a place to live. We don't build enough housing for folks already living here.
How about passing a bylaw that prohibits earbuds being used by cyclists and pedestrians when they are on the roadway. Simply having them.in your ears should be illegal.I know this should be done provincially in the HTA but Guelph likes to lead on protecting people from their own stew pid itee.
Been to many conferences that had motivational speakers. Do not remember a single thing they spoke about. That "job" is about as legit as a divorce coach or life coach.