You're describing Poilievre and the Conservatives more than Trudeau, the Liberals, or the NDP. Poilievre has nothing to offer but theatrics and the Conservatives' policies are entirely out of touch with reality.
Punting on the infrastructure work to focus on aesthetics isn’t going to save money in the long run. It just means all the beautification work being discussed will have to be redone when the infrastructure becomes too much of a problem to ignore. It’s penny wise and pound foolish.
Nobody who uses the word “woke” as a pejorative is to be taken seriously, especially if they’re complaining that they’re being discriminated against because they’re an old white guy. He sounds like the bully here, not library staff.
“I don't believe that people three doors up the street here on Andrew know that a homeless shelter could go in beside them, without any further recourse or discussion.”Really, Tim? We’re in the middle of a housing crisis driven in no small part by NIMBY opposition to development, and you’re bringing up the spectre of a homeless shelter to scare people? I’m disappointed.
This is disappointing. While one can certainly question the need for more parking given the large lots on the other side of the building, anything that would slow traffic (and move it out of the curb lane where it's hard to see from West St.) would make that intersection safer. You can't complain on the one hand about people speeding and on the other hand complain about things that make it hard for them to.Staff aren't the problem here. The small-town "we're locals and we know best" attitude is.
"Agenda 2030" is a UN plan for sustainable development adopted in 2015 and a frequent target of right-wing anti-government conspiracy types convinced that the UN is going to steal their land and set up a worldwide government or something. This event seems not to be about "local concerns" as much as the standard right-wing fringe.
The existing process was inclusive. This isn’t, and McIsaac needs to understand that as Mayor he is part of council. The role is not supposed to be superior to it.
“ Coun. Whitney Smith, who voted against the bike lanes in April, stood fast on that decision, noting the city's count of bike users along Laclie Street last summer was zero.”It was zero _because there are no bike lanes_. If people applied Smith's logic to cars there would never be a need to build more lanes because traffic fits in those that already exist.
The problem is not that building tunnels is expensive. The problem is that tunnelling under the 401 is a phenomenally stupid idea, even for Ford. If he were serious about reducing traffic he’d toll the 401 to match 407 and put the proceeds into transit instead of doing everything he can to encourage more people to drive.
I can’t believe we’re back to having discussions like this in 2025. Intensification is the only way to maintain the city's character. It can’t repeat the mistakes Barrie made (and continue to make) by sprawling into neighboring townships.
I really don't see the arguments against this. "They see a huge commercial type building being constructed"? It's on Atherley Road. It's already lined with commercial buildings. "Concerns about the impact the development could have on shoreline wildlife"? The shoreline is hardly pristine to begin with. "The density of the project will breed adverse effects in the neighbourhood"? Such as what? Having to share the area with others?It's private property. This isn't public land being given over to developers, and pursuing density over sprawl is just good policy. This sort of development makes far more sense than, say, paving over more farmland out west of Highway 11, and it really does not affect those lucky enough to have property on Orchard Point already except to increase their property values.