And incompetent liberal governments to drive our dollar down to $0.73! This is Canada’s hidden tariff on everything - brought to you by Mark Carney - elbows up indeed.
To all my neighbours: mind your own business. More government meddling in people’s lives. Maybe the citizens group mentioned above should expend their energy cleaning up a park.
Why is the landlord involved in this? Is the landlord responsible for the tenant’s car payments too?One solution to ease the so called housing crisis is to reduce the risk of being a landlord - something the city can easily do on many fronts.
Is a pharmacist the best professional to be administering and evaluating these medications? Will they have access to the patients' medical history? Who is going to bear the risk of malpractice (I suspect it will only be the guinea pig er... patient} ?Why not just go all the way and have the vaccinations available at corner stores - right beside the beer section OR we could have a properly functioning health care system look after this.
Why have I never seen data that show speeds under 50 km/hr present a danger to the public? None of the proposed measures will stop motorists running red left turn signals and stop signs . How many injuries will result from traffic cushions (obstructions) and barriers? Again no data. Council and many of my fellow Guelphites base their decisions on emotion not logic. The money spent on slowing down traffic would be better spent on improving intersection sight lines, teaching school children bike safety, and training Guelph transit drivers what to do at a stop sign (it’s not a “slow down” sign!)
Another useless tax grab from a council that is out of ideas. How will this be controlled? The city is going to employ empty home investigators? How I use my house is none of the city’s business.
These laws create conditions for Guelph to increase its inventory of substandard housing and attract people from other (and increasingly nicer) communities. The tax base will also be eroded, making it more unliveable for the rest of us
3.2 million dollars was taken out of our community and produced no benefit: there was no discernible change in the accident rate.In return we received just over $300,00. Some people can’t even manage a proper cash grab.
I wish our council would focus on running the city efficiently instead of inventing problems and up with new tax grabs to solve them. If an owner has an unused $500,000 property, the city wants to charge $40,000 on top of the ever increasing property tax he already pays. Property taxes are regressive and do not consider the owners ability to pay (unlike income tax).Also, an exemption process would now place an owner at the mercy of city bureaucrats - the newly formed Empty House Inspection Department-who are more interested in preserving a revenue stream rather than giving a property owner a break. Enough of this nonsense council!