Mining more salt...

Matt Saunders

thumbs-up 451
209 thumbs-down
OPINION: Guelph Transit is a failure; we need a real transit option.
GuelphToday
43
Can we please get some real transit and some real bike routes so that Guelph actually provides viable alternatives? Nobody is using what we have now because it is so badly broken, but every time you mention that, a very vocal minority just gets angry about the mere idea that we might want to buy something other than roads for cars.We need to build a viable alternative. This obsession with cars is not working.
15
22
What a disappointment and a missed opportunity. Keeping this as a car route is a throwback to 20th century thinking and no longer has any place here. Cities that have removed cars from their downtown squares have invariably seen those spaces become more vibrant and more successful, but we have apparently chosen instead to lock ourselves into an outdated design for decades. What are we even trying to do here?
19
25
The quickest way for the provincial government to impact the housing crisis? Build university residences.But Doug Ford's Conservative government is firmly in the pockets of the landlords, who are thrilled to rent to students at inflated rates, driving up housing prices for the rest of us. And now it's going to get even worse.
7
22
What a loss to the campus if they destroy this unique building. One of the few places in the area you can go and be around green plants even in the middle of winter.
8
25
Other cities in the area (with much higher density) have permitted backyard chickens and the sky has failed to fall. The answer here is for Ms. Peake and other concerned residents of Puslinch to engage in a bit of citizen advocacy, and if the demand for backyard chickens is there, the council will set limits and make backyard chickens legal in some non-agricultural zones. This article is a good start. Hopefully the people reading it will take a few minutes today and send a quick email to their local councillors and push this forward.
4
11
Yet another thing Doug Ford and his crony government have stolen from us. Ontario: you can't have what you need, and you can't have nice things either.
16
17
Bike lanes should not be on roads, period. For safety's sake we need them to be separated, otherwise nobody's going to use them. How many people on bikes need to be mowed down by drivers before we learn?
10
19
In 1995 $100k went a long way. In 2025, $100k is a reasonable salary for a low to mid level professional. With two incomes at that level you'd be lucky to buy a starter home. This list was a bad idea when it was invented and is less and less relevant every year. But it's great at riling up the base!
7
15
Looking forward to that fat carbon cheque hitting my account. If you don't like paying carbon tax burn less fuel. You've had eight years to figure this out.
11
11
Bob, how about you crowdfund the cost of the new 413 highway instead, and we use that money to build the bike and pedestrian infrastructure we actually need?
13
24
Excellent news. If the university could commit to housing all its students, the city's housing crises would ease substantially.
10
Lesson learned: if one unpaid volunteer group doesn't perfectly read the minds of whichever bureaucrat is in charge at the moment, the government gets to destroy things for a whole community.
13
20
Thanks to Coun. Caron for putting forward this motion and council for supporting it. Over and over again in the past ten years we've watched our city's assets slowly getting whittled away by shortsighted planning decisions. Facilities shuttered, programs unstaffed, parks eroded. City services are now objectively worse than they've ever been in the thirty five years I've lived here.I can't help but notice that Sleeman Park is right across the street from a very densely populated neighbourhood, one of the poorest in Guelph. Maybe let's not destroy the only nice thing in that neighbourhood. There are so many better ways to make targeted investments to encourage developers to actually build on the already-approved sites. Let's do that instead of further eroding our already diminshed city.
2
17
With so much time left in the term, the only reasonable answer is to give the voters of Ward 6 a chance to select who represents them. While the council can appoint any eligible elector to the role, any option aside from a by-election simply looks illegitimate. Once the seat is officially vacant, I expect we'll see an election date set soon after.
3
17
It was a mistake to consider this "industrial land" when so many other industrial-zoned plots are vacant in Eramosa Township. It's right next to a designated residential hamlet that relies on private wells, and a refrigerant plant specifically puts the groundwater at far too high a risk.We can hope this plant doesn't go forward but until we can convince the zoning authorities to fix it, this area will always have this sword of Damocles hanging over its head.
2
16
This entire stretch of Victoria from York to the river has outgrown its configuration. All four east side entrances are dangerous. But if PDI wants the city to tackle the cost alone, they'll need to bring something to the table, and so will the owners of the shopping plaza next door. If they want to show that they're good faith community members, they need to come forward with a plan fixes ALL the issues with this stretch. It will probably mean giving up some of their parking lot and extending Florence Lane east to give new access to the shopping plaza. It will probably mean moving their river's-edge fence so we can extend our riverside trail system. It will certainly mean making room for a multi-use path so the Victoria Road bike lane doesn't just abruptly end in the middle of a lawn.If PDI is willing to do all of these things for community safety, then we can in good faith believe that they do in fact have our safety as their primary concern.
3
11
Guelph has been sitting on an unfulfilled cycling master plan since 2012 and there's still not even a single safe bike route to get you from one side of the city to the other. I've been biking with my five year old son a lot this summer and it's insane how often we need to go on the sidewalk just to get from trail to trail. The plan itself is not even a good plan (no five year old should be riding on a bike lane with painted lines) but most of the city doesn't even have that. Maybe the City needs to worry more about building the trails they've promised to build and worry less about people who are taking matters into their own hands.
5
6
@freeandclear8: you're right that delivery trucks and emergency services still need access to downtown businesses, but there's a big leap between "some people need to" and "therefore everyone must always have the right". The gold-standard solution here would be to limit traffic to one-way for delivery during weekday business hours. Meanwhile we can open up five acres of public space for people to actually use, maintain all existing driveway access, and not even lose a lot of parking in the process. About bike lanes- you're 100% right. You have to be at least a little insane to want to bike among cars. Yikes. We need separated paths so active transportation is accessible for all ages/abilities.@SteveSpyderman Cars can be routed along Norfolk and Woolwich. There's no need for a third road. Having the extra route in all honestly makes traffic worse by adding extra unnecessary intersections. This may be surprising but it's been proven true in a number of world cities already.
9
10
@Erin Caton that argument from some members of the "disability community" holds no water. Is Stone Road Mall somehow inaccessible because you can't drive through the food court? Close three hundred meters of Wyndham Street and put accessible parking spots at the end of every new dead-end road; we'd then have more accessible parking spaces than we do now, and they would be on average closer to any given final destination. And the route would be safer and more direct. The "disability community" should support a street closure, not fight it.
4
6
Can't believe how many people are so entitled that they think they deserve to pollute for free. You want to pollute? Pay for it. Even with the fee your pollution is still deeply subsidized. You're still only paying less than a fifth of the true cost of your mess, and yet you want more.
7
Mining more salt...