The problem is capitalism. Affordable housing is low cost housing and that is low profit housing. I have said this before and will say it agin, if we want large volumesaof lowacost housing the goverment needs to build it with the same method that was done after WWii, prefab, premortgaged and on preassigned land.Free-will capitalism will never respond,
It is positive news.Guelph's rising cost of living is a real concern for many residents. For a single renter, monthly expenses average $3,800–$4,000, with rent taking nearly half (~$1,900–$2,145). Seniors and low-income families are struggling to cover essentials like groceries and daily needs—you'd need about $23+/hour just to get by. With housing so tight, we need more homes and rental units on the market across the board to boost supply and drive prices down—yet City Hall is fighting developers on key apartment projects in the downtown core, while others sit dormant and stalled. Let's work together compassionately to cut the red tape, get these builds moving, and create a more affordable future for our community.
There will always be those that choose not to stay in shelters or follow the rules to stay in housing. Taxpayers should not be on the hook for those that choose substance abuse over having a place to stay.
There are a number of 2 storey, multi-unit buildings on this road and in the neigbourhood. It is a good fit and 2 bedrooms allows for families. I live in this neighbourhood, we are a multi-generational family and I would happily move into such a unit to stay close to my family when the time comes. Thank you for thinking of what people want and need.
Great, so we'll have a big grocery store that has a smaller pharmacy right across the parking lot from a big pharmacy that has a little grocery store. Makes sense.
I'd like to know if the intent is to close the Silvercreek Shoppers, or if we're adding a new pharmacy to Guelph. Opening a new pharmacy sounds great, but moving a pharmacy away from one densely-populated area to another doesn't seem like it serves the city well.And though I'm not one to tell someone how to spend their hard-earned investment money, there's really no point in opening a brand new oil change shop in 2026. What are you going to do in eight years when half the cars on the road are electric? In twenty years when it's 99%?
Does not matter what apartment rent is. Going on my 18th year of renting a room in someone else's house. Can't imagine how great it would be to have a private space free from roomies noise, mess and personality quirks. There is definitely a three class system in Guelph. Home owners, apartment dwellers and room renters, with some landlord having the audacity to rent rooms out as "sharing" which means two people to a room.
Some good news for Guelph renters - an almost 6.5% decrease isn’t enough to break out the bubbly but at least it’s in the right direction!That still leaves many Guelphites facing unaffordable housing costs and don’t think that builders and developers(despite Federal, Provincial or municipal initiatives) are going to jump in with new starts at the “affordable” end of the market! In addition to low cost or “geared to income” rentals the nation and the provinces need to drastically increase minimum wages and a guaranteed income for all!
This comment relies on familiar talking points but shows a shallow understanding of both housing data and municipal authority. Claims that affordability is driven by a lack of supply fail basic scrutiny: vacancy rates are high, and Guelph has already approved many units that remain unbuilt. If supply approvals were the real constraint, those projects would be moving—not sitting idle.Blaming “red tape” ignores the fact that cities do not control interest rates, construction financing, labour costs, or developer risk tolerance—the real reasons projects stall. Council can approve zoning and permits; it cannot compel private developers to build when projects no longer pencil out.Citing cost‑of‑living pressures while sidestepping vacancies and dormant approvals is selective framing, not serious analysis. Affordability is a real crisis, and it demands jurisdictional literacy and evidence‑based solutions.
We should not expect the feds to carry such a project beyond providing assistance on funding. Local residents should be better informed regarding the existing problems the community is facing. Professionals should be lined up to provide their expertise in solving the problem and then delivering the solution. We tend to criticize the feds for both a lack of and an excessive degree of involvement, without even knowing what it is we want, except to scream the threatening: Solve the problem; else we shall vote for your opponent. Not a very constructive attitude to bring to the table.
Good. Now can we please please please have a departure time from Union heading to Guelph ANY time between 6:15pm and 9:30pm?? That's a huge block of time that leaves Guelphites stranded in Toronto.