Mining more salt...
Guelph councillor seeks review of county’s shelter policies
26
Erin Caton has ALREADY announced publicly that she is not running for re-election. Good to see she plans to work on city issues through to the end of her term in November.
5
Must e an election coming up. Time to get some news exposure.
18
21
The GRCA has never been much of a conservation authority! They are now more of a developer friendly money making machine!
1
17
The GRCA...flood villages and farms and now destroying bird houses. Good job guys.
3
19
They need to remove the word "Conservation" from their name.
1
18
If a review examines the entire picture, then I'm all for it... How many people sought shelter? How many were admitted? How many were refused? Why were they refused??? How many were offered hotel placements? How many accepted? How many declined? How many were excluded due to safety concerns, and how many due to violence, threats, or repeated rule violations? I asked similar questions previously and they've gone unanswered... Just as importantly, how many people chose city hall despite available shelter options, and why?? The categories and data matter because if we're not evaluating the system...... then we're not looking for answers.. .we're looking for evidence to support a conclusion already reached... good policy needs good data... that's how to keep politics out of it.
1
3
There are hundreds (maybe thousands) of beds that could be used, but the officials won't even acknowledge it. Can't imagine why? Emergency Services,Air conditioning along with kitchen and bathroom facilities are there too. It's on a bus route and it is called the University of Guelph.
16
16
If they were old in the 70s they are likely dead now. So much for that line of reasoning.
2
18
That’s wonderful that you sincerely apologize for destroying the nesting boxes, but I don’t see any mention of rectifying the damage? It’s basic principle if you damage something you fix or replace it. The GRCA isn’t setting a very good example here.
11
I would like the Mayor and Councillors to explain why they are spending our tax dollars on this when they claim there was no way to avoid an almost 8% tax increase for 2026. These pet projects have contributed to a 38% tax increase in the last four years! Come on council, start looking at where OUR money is being spent and direct it to BASIC services. You’ve had four years to address non sustainable spending and nothing to show for it.
6
16
Wow!
16
I have to ask, was there a GRCA representative there when the kids placed all the birdhouses? Or were they given to them to install? The driver of the mower obviously didn't realize there was a safe zone to avoid. All I see is our birds yet again being massacred and a serious issue with communication, mapping and planning. I feel bad for the kids too. They learned a very hard reality, adults in charge miss the big picture.We don't have conservation at the level we should. We don't enforce bird protection granted either. We still don't have chickadee returning after over 100 nests, babies and eggs with adults were killed by our community developer with absolutely not even a slap on the wrist or call from the city before they did it eleven years ago. Why have an MBCA when community leaders won't enforce?
13
Will they map potholes and fix those? How much does this cost?
3
14
Caton isn't running again, which you would know if you spent 30 seconds checking. But don't let facts get in the way of your narrative. Some people we elect actually do try to make sure they do their jobs for everyone, not just donors.
1
15
I hope they plan to replace all the birdhouses at their expense. They should meet the students in their classrooms & explain how & why the boxes were destroyed, how to prevent it occurring again & GRCA will either replace them or if the students wish to rebuild them themselves, GRCA will provide all necessary materials at no cost to the school or students. Perhaps GRCA can suggest a safer place to install the birdhouses. GRCA needs to restore their reputation to the children they disillusioned.
8
Commenters need to do some research on the many values of trees: air quality, human health, birds and insects, shade and climate change are just a few of the benefits trees bring to our city. Better to spend the money on trees than pavement.
6
10
Do we know where the mayor plans to work after the election?
3
10
Their is absolutely no reason that the existing hwy 7 between Guelph & Kitchener could not be rebuilt to suit the highways needs .. New bridges , interchanges , don't need to happen . They were going to do it in the early 70s , but due to government cuts they decided not to . I worked on it at that time . It's less than 10 km .
3
11
Doug does something every few years. There is no intention to build the highway, just put up signs.
2
7
I can understand why city hall people don’t want it to be used for a temporary shelter. It must be uncomfortable to confront problem you helped create.
6
Mining more salt...