as we all know the cost will balloon to 4 mil by the time its done, to save what, an arch?, and the constant rehabilitation for years down the road, total waste of tax payers money...
Thank you to Council for listening to all the emails and delegates on this important issue and for reaching the best decision for Guelph. This bridge has been part of the City's long-term planning for years. Its heritage value was extensively studied, and Council unanimously approved its designation just six weeks ago! Staff have confirmed that rehabilitation is already accommodated within the existing capital infrastructure plan—it is not a new tax increase.Council also invested significant public resources to reach this point through engineering studies, environmental assessment, heritage planning, formal public engagement, consultant work and hundreds of staff hours. Staff further advised that reversing course would require additional costs, hundreds more staff hours, and new heritage processes.Reasonable people can disagree on priorities, but long-term infrastructure and heritage decisions deserve to be based on facts, planning, and good governance—not election sound bites.
Another blatant example of how this “current” council thinks taxpayers are nothing but an ATM!! Spend, spend, spend. After receiving my latest tax bill is proof positive that they have to go. Everybody should remember the arrogance and disrespectful treatment this council has done to us over the past couple of years, and make them the past! VOTE FOR CHANGE OR ACCEPT THE SAME.
Why not....not their money. Over budget, no big deal. Wrong contractor...again, so what...falls apart in 5 years...who cares! The days of elected people having zero responsibility has got to end.
The climate cult of City Hall needs only to look at their former colleague who jumped ship to join the Liberal Party in Ottawa. The Liberals net zero lunacy is making life more expensive for every Canadian.
If the cost increases to $4.0M as many projects like this do escalate materially, it will cost every family of four in Guelph $133.00. In before income tax dollars that's ~$175. Or about a third of your annual property tax annual increase. Basically if they don't restore this we can cut annual property tax increase by 35% for a year. In case you're wondering why our property taxes increase 6% every year.
Here's a wild idea... why don't the teachers receive evaluations, like in the private sector... and in schools? If we're doing a great job and are on top of things, it shouldn't be a concern, right? If we're concerned about student attendance, how about measuring teacher attendance? Or how about - works well with others... without threatening to strike if we don't get our way.Perhaps we teachers can model the behavior that we'd like to see and be part of the solution. (And before the namecalling starts, let's not forget about evaluating critical thinking skills! Just because someone disagrees with you doesn't mean they are stupid and uninformed.)
Another "announcement" from the Ford gov't. providing nothing of value to the communities involved but publicity for the gov't. at the taxpayers expense. As it's unlikely the "new" Highway 7 will be drivable in my lifetime (though we've been getting smoke up the wazoo from the ministry for more than 30 years), I'll just throttle back any enthusiasm!I'd suggest Ford and Sarkaria show some shame but I won't hold my breath.
Should offer free transit downtown instead -- that would actually help people get downtown (and they wouldn't need to worry about finding a parking spot).
If we raise property taxes by $1000 and use it to build a city my family can safely bus and bike in, I won't pay for a second car and we'll be $9000 ahead.
This municipal government believes their responsibility is economic redistribution. Take from those who work more and give to those who work less. (Putting flame suit on for the classic Guelphites I’ve just riled up).
This is absolutely awesome and great news for both of these great organizations and all the others trying to help in however way they are able to. I am thankful and grateful that people used their voices individually and collectively to bring awareness to the issues that many organizations are facing in this city.Keep speaking up!!
Adam, I'm wondering if maybe it's time you find a different career? You sat there on Tuesday and threw a hissy fit when Councillors asked questions, and you don't seem to like anything that anyone says in public. Maybe give something less...opinion-driven a shot? You could cover sports, or food.
I can think of quite a few overpaid positions in Guelph that should be removed from payroll. Paramedics aren't among them.Best for voters to take a long hard look at where their tax dollars are being spent and then elect people who'll make the needed/necessary cuts. Guelph seems to think that they can continue their spending by simply increasing taxes to make it all work.