Mining more salt...
City staff give thumbs up to what would be Guelph's tallest building
14
How unfortunate!
21
13
This is great news! Energy equity is a health issue. We have minimum heat requirements in the winter because we understand the risks of extreme cold. As temperatures continue to rise, we need maximum heat standards in the summer too. No senior, person living with lung disease, or vulnerable renter should be forced to suffer in unsafe indoor temperatures simply because they don’t own their home. Safe housing should protect people in every season.
18
21
What? Now Energy has rights? Can it vote? lol...hilarious - the City is going to monitor air temperature...lol. Its gotta end eventually doesn't it?
9
19
Prime example of council, specifically Caron and Alt , opting for the most expensive choice. “The cost of that work is pegged at nearly 3 million” which means it will run closer to 5 million. Again this council thinking that taxpayers have endless amounts of extra cash laying around. The end of your time spending our money with wanton disregard cannot come soon enough.Guelph taxpayers; please, please, please remember examples like this when casting your vote.
10
19
This is a joke right.
9
15
Bridges are functional infrastructure. They aren’t meant to last forever. This is not the Golden Gate. Replace it with something low cost, safe, and functional and move on. Thank you councillors for finally listening to the electorate.
11
19
24 stories, that's cute, Guelph council should take a visit to Waterloo or Kitchener.Anyways, enough with the hand wringing, just approve and build.
7
14
Most citizens respect the need to preserve our heritage buildings and architecture. However, at a time when people are seriously struggling, this decision shows a lack of respect for those who can least afford it. We need more on council who have lived a more frugal lifestyle out of necessity. Take a look at the votes and let that inform who you vote for next election.
11
10
One heat wave killed over 250 people in London last year. The heat dome over Europe last week likely killed dozens more.Now watch all the commenters behind their comfortable air-conditioned keyboards call it a joke and tell us that renters deserve it.
15
8
The city has made the right choice. The spend is worth it to preserve such a beautiful and important piece of our heritage. That's what tax money is for!
17
13
As a rate payer, I would rather they do the cheaper option. It's functional and faster.I personally don't see anything about the current structure that demand's it's preservation. It was a functional structure, not art. This is not the West Montrose Covered bridge that serves as a tourist attraction. It's a way to cross the river. It used to be for cars as well and it was downgraded to just pedestrians. It doesn't need to do more than that.
10
10
Goller is one of my councillors - and I definitely emailed him about how unnecessary it is to rehabilitate this bridge. Glad he is listening.As someone who uses the trails and this bridge on a semi regular basis, I don't care if it's old concrete or new steel. Just because something is old doesn't mean it has historical importance.
13
15
This administration seems to think every taxpayer is just an ATM and has unlimited money to spend on pet projects. I'm going to be voting for people who actually care about fiscal responsibility in the upcoming election.
8
6
I think this should include every resident not just renters. They are lots of homeowners that don’t have air conditioning because they simply can’t afford it. The City should force them too. I certainly wouldn’t have an indoor visit with them in July. Now that I think back about my childhood, I wonder what my parents were thinking. I didn’t have air conditioning and I believe it has affected me. I’m really glad the city is raising this issue. Maybe they could mandate pools next. I can’t afford that either
17
11
... and nobody bothers to ask why Canada needs to perpetually increase its populatiion, rip apart its cities, increase the demands upon its infrastructure, and thereby drive up the cost of real estate forever into the future.In a rational country, appropriate plans would be in place for citiesto have a certain fixed population level. But in Canada, we take our existing urban areas and then demand that they be able to provide all the necessary accommodations for a doubling and eventual tripling of the contained population. Imagine southern Ontario in 100 years: what will its population be?? What will a residence cost? What will the urban skyline look like? What will we see in our neighbourhoods when we look out our windows? What will the morning commuting time look like on our roads and public transit? What about the amount of open space within and between our cities? What about farmland and agricultural products? And no one asks why.John Hagopian Whitby
11
22
A fine like this... are you kidding? This should be much much higher! This is not a repairable fix. At what age does a person realize they don't want bodily waste in their cup? And as for the City... 😵‍💫😳😳👺
17
exactly, just another reason to force people out of the rental ownership, many of these buildings have hot water systems, the costs to retrofit with forced air systems would be prohibitive. many more will bail out of providing rentals..
4
8
The only people who show up for those exercises are the activists. You might as well ask a bunch of vegans what type of burgers should be served at the Calgary stampede. You’ll get a clear answer, but it won’t be the right one.
12
13
93 parking spots. impossible to find parking downtown now. Wait until this opens. The businesses might as well all close and just move to Stone Road. Did the city planners and counsellors not realize that as much as they think these people will not have cars they will .and I guarantee it’ll be more than 93
7
14
Brooklyn Bridge, Golden Gate, Confederation, iconic. Stone road bridge, not so much. Take notes on who is wasteful with the public purse come this November.
6
Mining more salt...