That is 100% absolutely that wrong decision to make.The people who used City Hall last winter, as am emergency warming shelter, were people that were unable to access 23 Gordon Street. This article acknowledges the location was not at full capacity last winter. There are reasons why.Now City Hall is closing the door on Guelph's most vulnerable. A very bad and irresponsible decision. This will become an election issue and will end up embassassing City staff, City Council and show disconnect between a public building and it's residents.
Why is it a bad decision now that steppingstone can accommodate everyone? Oh but catch is they have to follow some rules, which is why they have chosen not to go to steppingstone and instead wreak havoc at City Hall.
Why stop there, Matt? Maybe we can turn the Basilica of Our Lady of Immaculate Conception into a transit terminal for light rail, or maybe even demolish it and put a 20 storey condo tower above, retail on ground level, and light rail right beside it. Perfect, n'est pas??John HagopianWhitby
I would like to see what will happen to MacDonell Street next year during the Memorial cup. How embarrassing for our city. It should have been given to Kitchener for this reason! Our taxes will go through the roof!
This is a perfect example of needing a strong mayor and council who can make difficult decisions and are not afraid to say no to special interest groups.
Where have you been for the past 40 years?? Multiple attempts to "revitalize" the downtown have failed. Every new one is promised to be the magic bullet.No amount of aesthetics will resurrect the downtown. Rather actual living customers and merchants who are open when customers want...NOT the other way around.
I think we can all live with a little construction to accommodate the needs of businesses and residences and facilitate growth. What will keep people away is drug addled people, staggering around yelling obscenities, or sprawled out in storefront vestibules. These people seem to be everywhere now and yet nothing seems to be done to deter them, arrest them? We have to address this problem or the downtown will be doomed even after the work is completed.
It's historic, yes, but it's also in an excellent spot to be an active transportation crossing. Especially after last year when we lost the other historic bridge just to the north. I'm looking forward to seeing this as part of a future extension of the RRT.
I think its a great heritage piece but at more than double the price of replacement, (and likely much faster) we should just remove it. Save, some pieces like the date at the top and make a plaque with the story of the bridge. And showcase a couple artifacts.This decision should have come 10 years ago. The bridge is too far gone now.
Gross overstatement. Seeing something and being over run with it aren't the same. Say did you see the park down by the boathouse? It was over run and ruined by a huge flock of 4 geese. They are everywhere now, just laying across pathways, Better you stay away from there too.
Few bother to take a long view of the rise and fall of successive multiple downtowns. Demolition by fire and iffy construction historically removed dozens of buildings along Cork, Macdonell and Quebec. City maps from the mid-19thC on graphically show this decay/rejuvenation process. Alarmists pay no attention to this and cling to a static view of an "old" downtown that ignores both its past and possible futures. "Downtown 2026" is painfully shorton "destination" value. Any improvement depends on the "new bones" the holes, trenches and closed streets require.Current inconvenience is just a down payment on a far better downtown.