This is a pretty hilarious letter. Gary fails to mention the fact that council wage increases have been far below union increases for decades and if in fact we retroactively increased council pay to that of union increases over the last 20 years council pay would be far higher than what is being done over the next number of years. Talk about sour grapes. I'm sure most people have seen what many of the cities union workers do or dont do in a day and I dont think you'd find too many people supportive of the increases they have received over the last 20 years. Many (not all) are gravy train jobs for people who could not come anywhere close to their salary in the private sector. Council pay is not based on whether or not you agree with their decisions and please do some research. The private sector had a decade plus to build a turf facility and council actually gave a rezoning to a private developer to build one....it never happened.
Norm, while your point is valid I think this is tone deaf.Taxpayers are trying to tell you they can't afford anything more. At some point this needs to stop. The majority of tax payers feel like they are taken advantage of by employers and are worth more than their salary. This is where the frustration often lies....People who are having a hard time right now don't think it's fair and I tend to agree at this point.
The leaders are accountable every 4 years in elections. Would you hold all the union members to the same standard where union members only get raises after their performance has been evaluated every year? Would you also ask those same union members to campaign for their job every 4 years and risk losing it? You mention that several councillors own local businesses and have influenced zoning/permits that have helped them. Please name them and which zoning/permits they influenced in their favour. I dont anticipate you actually following through by providing actual proof of your statements because it sounds like coffee shop garbage.
These elected official knew their responsibilities when they went into the jobs and what the compensation was, so they are well looked after. Appears a lot of them are there just for their recognition, etc.
(Part 2)Why should Thunder Bay families - fcing 4%+ tax hikes, infrastructure deficits, high living costs, and out-migration - subsidize one of the highest councillor-to-population ratios while council members' private businesses potentially benefit from (or block) decisions made at the table? The “only wealthy people can afford to run” argument falls flat when we have dedicated people serving now, and higher pay won't fix representation... it just costs more and may attract those seeking influence over income.True public service involves sacrifice. Before locking in these massive raises that outpace what most taxpayers receive, council should demonstrate restraint: tighter budgets, measurable results, reduced council size, stronger conflict rules, and leadership that feels the same pressures as the residents paying their cheques.We deserve accountable governance on our dime... not an insulated group gradually professionalizing self-regulation.
Perhaps it is time for Canada to adopt a Siberia style of incarnation for forced industrial work, especially for the habitual criminals. At a $152,700.00 + per year per head it is time the tax payer got better value for their dollar.
Well said, Gary Dennis.Council pay should be tied to union increases and actual performance - not automatic 9% compounded hikes that nearly double councillors’ salaries from ~$33k to ~$62k (mayor to ~$174k) by 2033.This is a part-time job in a city of ~110k–117k with an oversized 13-member council (mayor + 12). Larger cities like Barrie (~148k) manage with just 11 members. Taxpayers are already facing 4%+ tax hikes, infrastructure deficits, and pet projects (event centre, roundabouts, turf facility, etc.).Several councillors own local businesses and have influenced zoning/permits affecting their own interests - raising pay only heightens conflict-of-interest risks.True leadership means showing the same restraint demanded of city staff and residents. Link raises to union settlements, cut waste, and consider shrinking council size. Voters will remember this at election time.We need accountable leaders who feel the same pressures as the people paying the bills.
He wants a government that is accountable to its taxpayers and citizens. We all want that but all we ever get is higher taxes and less essential services.